Participatory Action ResearchFrom "
16 Tenets of Participatory Action Research" by Robin McTaggart (1989)
Participatory Action Research
1. is an approach to improving social practice by changing it
2. is contingent on authentic participation
3. is collaborative
4. establishes self-critical communities
5. is a systematic learning process
6. involves people in theorising about their practices
7. requires that people put their practices, ideas and assumptions about institutions to the test
8. involves keeping records
9. requires participants to objectify their own experiences
10. is a political process
11. involves making critical analyses
12. starts small
13. starts with small cycles
14. starts with small groups
15. allows and requires participants to build records
16. allows and requires participants to give a reasoned justification of their social (educational) work to othersFrom "
A Short Note on Participatory Research" by Sirisena Tilakaratna (1990):
The key features of participatory research are:
* people are the subjects of research: the dichotomy between subject and object is broken
* people themselves collect the data, and then process and analyse the information using methods easily understood by them
* the knowledge generated is used to promote actions for change or to improve existing local actions
* the knowledge belongs to the people and they are the primary beneficiaries of the knowledge creation
* research and action are inseparable – they represent a unity
* research is a praxis rhythm of action-reflection where knowledge creation supports action
* people function as organic intellectuals
* there is an built-in mechanism to ensure authenticity and genuineness of the information that is generated because people themselves use the information for life improvement.
The promotion of participatory research is basically an exercise in stimulating the people to:
* collect information
* reflect and analyse it
* use the results as a knowledge base for life improvement, and
* whenever possible, to document the results for wider dissemination ie for the creation of a people’s literature.
The role of the outside professional is to promote the above processes. This can be done by:
* assisting people to collect data and then to process and analyse the information using simple methods which enables them to systematise their knowledge
* linking the local situation (which the people know best) to the larger external situation (about which the outside may know more)
* improving people’s access to new information and formal knowledge (eg technology)
* introducing local people to experiences from outside their environment
* throwing up relevant issues or problems for local people to reflect on and analyse and then assisting them in coming to their own conclusions.
Participatory Approach
Aims to involve participants in the design, conduct and evaluation of research.

Public Education Leadership Project (PELP) Coherence Framework
from: http://www.hbs.edu/pelp/images/graphic-framework-lg.gif
The PELP Coherence Framework is designed to help leaders identify the key elements that support a district-wide improvement strategy and to bring these elements into a coherent and integrated relationship. School district leaders leverage this framework to develop strategies that work towards improving student performance throughout the district.
The framework assists with achieving and sustaining coherence by:
* Connecting the instructional core with a district-wide strategy for improvement.
* Highlighting district elements that can support or hinder effective implementation.
* Identifying interdependencies among district elements.
* Recognizing forces in the environment that have an impact on the implementation of strategy.
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) attempts to capture some of the essential qualities of
knowledge required by teachers for technology integration in their teaching, while addressing the complex, multifaceted and situated nature of
teacher knowledge. At the heart of the TPCK framework, is the complex interplay of three primary forms of knowledge:
Content (CK),
Pedagogy (PK), and
Technology (TK).
See PDF by
Mishra & Koehler
http://www.tpck.org/tpck/images/tpck/d/dc/TPCK_3_CIRCLE_WITH_LABELS.png
The TPCK approach goes beyond seeing these three knowledge bases in isoloation. On the other hand, it emphasizes the new kinds of knowledge that lie at the intersections between them. Considering P and C together we get Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK), Shulman’s idea of knowledge of pedagogy that is applicable to the teaching of specific content. Similarly, considering T and C taken together, we get Technological Content Knowledge (TCK), the knowledge of the relationship between technology and content. At the intersection of T and P, is Technological Pedagogical Knowledge (TPK), which emphasizes the existence, components and capabilities of various technologies as they are used in the settings of teaching and learning.
Finally, at the intersection of all three elements is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK). True technology integration is understanding and negotiating the relationships between these three components of knowledge. A teacher capable of negotiating these relationships represents a form of expertise different from, and greater than, the knowledge of a disciplinary expert (say a mathematician or a historian), a technology expert (a computer scientist) and a pedagogical expert (an experienced educator). Effective technology integration for pedagogy around specific subject matter requires developing sensitivity to the dynamic, [transactional] relationship between all three components. 8 Essential Learning Functions
Engage – 6 Essential Conditions